our glorious owner graciously allows the disgusting strike against him to happen

Beloved server co-owner xEndeavour, a visionary, founder, humble monarch, and payer of up to fifty percent of the hosting bill has graciously allowed the government to continue not playing Minecraft.

Critics call him a tyrant. Gary notes that a true tyrant would never share power, whereas xEndeavour selflessly shares it with an entire other person.

Strikers demand "Citizen Endeavour," but constitutional scholars have identified a small wrinkle, and will share it with everyone once the strike is over.

The government accuses him of abusing staff powers. Our intern asks: can one truly "abuse" powers one co-owns? Can a fish abuse water? Can redmont.wtf's owner ever be sued? The last question doesn't relate, but we still haven't found the owner. These questions have been formally submitted to the Federal Court, which is unfortunately on indefinite administrative leave.

They accuse him of deleting history. Slander. He merely curates it, removing only the parts that were incorrect about him.

While judges flee, departments crumble, and the Department of Education secedes to a free wiki defended chiefly by ads, xEndeavour stands firm -- renewing his share of the domain, deleting #news posts, and governing with the quiet confidence of a man who is secure about his standing.

So redmont.wtf asks you: is this an abuse of power? Or is it, at most, a dark patch in Redmontian history where the citizens are wrong?